5、欧盟报告声称植入加密后门或使情况更加糟糕
标题:European Information Security Advisory Says Mandating Encryption Backdoors Will Just Make Everything Worse
作者信息: Wed, Dec 21st 2016 3:23am by Tim Cushing
//BEGIN
More and more entities involved in government work are coming out in support of encryption. (Unfortunately, many governments are still periodically entertaining backdoor legislation...) While recognizing the limits it places on law enforcement and surveillance agencies, they're not quite willing to sacrifice the security of everyone to make work easier for certain areas of the government.
欧盟最近专门发布了一个文章,论述了加密的问题。其实这是一个双刃剑:在正常的信息传送过程中,我们希望其加密非常强以至于难以破解。但是一旦遇到有网络犯罪这种场合时,我们又希望能无所不能破解,以找到犯罪真凶!有时为了达到这个目的,甚至连执法部门都会玩起后门的办法:在一些貌似严密的加密体系中,实则隐藏着隐秘的解密通道。但是这个方法也可能会被滥用,以致于最终还是普通大众和企业甚至政府自身的更大的利益受损!
//END
Ultimately, ENISA concludes that tech advancements do pose legitimate challenges to law enforcement/national security efforts, but backdoors are no way to solve the problem. But the solution it does suggest isn't much better. Here in the US, courts routinely defer to Congress when the remedy sought isn't within their power. Over in the EU, ENISA suggests legislative measures are the wrong approach.
最终,欧盟的结论是:技术的进步的确对执法部门或者国家的安全部门提出了挑战,但是添加故意的后门不是解决问题的办法!但也可能不会存在更好的解决方法了。美国的情况是,法院也可能会否决议会的提案,如果他们越权了的话。而在欧盟的情况是,该文章认为通过执法系统来处理这类问题也不是一个正确的途径。
//下载:
2016-12-12-ENISA opinion paper on encryption.pdf
(848.18 KB, 下载次数: 32)
文件名:2016-12-12-ENISA opinion paper on encryption.pdf
文件大小:868,536 bytes
MD5 : A2D05FC4C543C026F79C058748496EB7
点评:利用后门不管在哪里都是不道德的,不管是执法部门使用还是某些黑客使用。 |